PM Management-Portland NC, LLC D/B/A Trisun Care Center Coastal Palms and Senior Care Centers v. Benita Martinez, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Ruben Martinez
This text of PM Management-Portland NC, LLC D/B/A Trisun Care Center Coastal Palms and Senior Care Centers v. Benita Martinez, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Ruben Martinez (PM Management-Portland NC, LLC D/B/A Trisun Care Center Coastal Palms and Senior Care Centers v. Benita Martinez, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Ruben Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-18-00205-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
PM MANAGEMENT-PORTLAND NC, LLC D/B/A TRISUN CARE CENTER COASTAL PALMS AND SENIOR CARE CENTERS, ET AL., Appellants,
v.
BENITA MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RUBEN MARTINEZ, DECEASED, Appellee.
On appeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa
Appellee Benita Martinez, individually and on behalf of the estate of Ruben
Martinez, deceased (Martinez) filed suit against appellant PM Management-Portland NC, LLC d/b/a Trisun Care Center Coastal Palms and Senior Care Centers, LLC (PM
Management) and appellants, Manzoor A. Bevinal, M.D., Bipasha Nath, M.D., and
Corpus Christi Hospitalists, P.L.L.C. (collectively CC Hospitalists). PM Management and
CC Hospitalists have each perfected an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order
denying their respective motions to dismiss Martinez’s suit.
PM Management and CC Hospitalists have filed separate unopposed motions to
dismiss the appeal. PM Management represents that it has reached a settlement
agreement with Martinez. CC Hospitalists represent that Martinez has filed a motion to
dismiss her claims against them in the trial court. The Court, having considered the
documents on file and the unopposed motions to dismiss, is of the opinion that the
motions should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. 42.1(a)(1). The motions to dismiss are
granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the
parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See id. R 42.1(d). Having
dismissed the appeal at the appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
LETICIA HINOJOSA Justice
Delivered and filed the 24th day of September, 2020.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
PM Management-Portland NC, LLC D/B/A Trisun Care Center Coastal Palms and Senior Care Centers v. Benita Martinez, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Ruben Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pm-management-portland-nc-llc-dba-trisun-care-center-coastal-palms-and-texapp-2020.