Plymouth Clothing House v. Seymour
This text of 77 N.W. 239 (Plymouth Clothing House v. Seymour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal herein under rule 14 for noncompliance with rule 11 (60 Minn. vi), as to the service of paper book and points and authorities. Noncompliance with this rule is admitted, but the appellant claims that the motion must be denied because the respondent has not served a written notice upon its attorneys requiring the return to be made, as provided by rule 4.
We have repeatedly decided and announced the decision from the [426]*426bench that rule 4 was intended to speed the prosecution of appeals by permitting the respondent to secure a dismissal of the appeal for a failure to file the return within the time limited, whether the court be in session or not, and that it in no manner affects the right of the respondent to move for a dismissal of the appeal for noncompliance with rule 11.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 N.W. 239, 74 Minn. 425, 1898 Minn. LEXIS 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plymouth-clothing-house-v-seymour-minn-1898.