Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Plyer v. Pitagora, No. 560439 (Jul. 9, 2002)

Plyer v. Pitagora, No. 560439 (Jul. 9, 2002)

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 8456
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJuly 9, 2002
DocketNo. 560439
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 8456 (Plyer v. Pitagora, No. 560439 (Jul. 9, 2002)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plyer v. Pitagora, No. 560439 (Jul. 9, 2002), 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 8456 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO STRIKE
(1) The court denies the motions to strike the second and fourth counts for the reasons set forth in the attached decision of Amari Jones, PPA,et al v. William Gulley, M.D., et al, No. 558526. The allegations of the negligence count can form the basis of a recklessness claim, see paragraphs 10(c) and (d) of the second count and paragraphs 11(c) and (d) of the fourth count.

(2) The court does grant the motion to strike as to the claim for double or treble damages against Umberto Pitagora for the reasons set forth in Robinson v. McWeeney, 16 CLR 514 (1996), which is attached.

___________________ Corradino, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. McWeeney, No. Cv 950379968 (Apr. 23, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 2895-DDD (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 8456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plyer-v-pitagora-no-560439-jul-9-2002-connsuperct-2002.