Plus v. Residents of Key Largo Ocean Shores

598 So. 2d 324, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6079, 1992 WL 109525
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 1992·No. No. 91-2703·Published

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

In recommending the issuance of a permit sought by the appellant Dolphins Plus, the hearing officer also found that the protestors, the present appellees, had “participated in this proceeding for a frivolous purpose” and therefore recommended the assessment of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs against them under section 120.-59, Florida Statutes (1991). On review, although the appellees did not provide a transcript of the proceedings below, the Department of Environmental Regulation reversed this determination.1 On the authority of the virtually identical case of Burke v. Harbor Estates Assocs., 591 So.2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), with which we wholly agree, that determination is itself reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to adopt and approve the hearing officer’s recommendation in its entirety.

Reversed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plus v. Residents of Key Largo Ocean Shores, 598 So. 2d 324, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6079, 1992 WL 109525 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

598 So. 2d 324 (Plus v. Residents of Key Largo Ocean Shores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burke v. Harbor Estates Associates, Inc.
591 So. 2d 1034 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)