Plunkett v. Falls County

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 17, 1996·No. 95-50782·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50782 Summary Calendar __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

R.D. PLUNKETT; JAN C. PLUNKETT,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

FALLS COUNTY ET AL.,

Defendants,

LARRY PAMPLIN ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-94-CV-85 - - - - - - - - - - June 10, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

R.D. Plunkett and Jan Plunkett appeal the district court's

partial dismissal of their action, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

and RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et. seq., for failure to state a claim

and the court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-50782 -2-

remaining defendant. We have conducted a de novo review of the

record and affirm the partial dismissal for essentially the same

reasons set forth by the district court. United States v. Falls

County, No. W-94-CA-085 (W.D. Tex. June 9, 1995). We have

conducted a de novo review of the record and affirm the summary

judgment for essentially the same reasons set forth by the

district court. United States v. Falls County, No. W-94-CA-085

(W.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 1995).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plunkett v. Falls County, (5th Cir. 1996).

Plunkett v. Falls County (Plunkett v. Falls County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Definitions
18 U.S.C. § 1961