Plunkett v. Board Pension, C., Hoboken
176 A. 341, 114 N.J.L. 273, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 226
This text of 176 A. 341 (Plunkett v. Board Pension, C., Hoboken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Plunkett v. Board Pension, C., Hoboken, 176 A. 341, 114 N.J.L. 273, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 226 (N.J. 1935).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 274
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
176 A. 341, 114 N.J.L. 273, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plunkett-v-board-pension-c-hoboken-nj-1935.