Plunkett v. Board Pension, C., Hoboken
176 A. 341, 114 N.J.L. 273, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 226
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 274
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Plunkett v. Board Pension, C., Hoboken, 176 A. 341, 114 N.J.L. 273, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 226 (N.J. 1935).
176 A. 341 (Plunkett v. Board Pension, C., Hoboken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.