Plunkett v. Bain

144 Misc. 928, 259 N.Y.S. 918, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1287
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedOctober 19, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 144 Misc. 928 (Plunkett v. Bain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plunkett v. Bain, 144 Misc. 928, 259 N.Y.S. 918, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1287 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1932).

Opinion

Evans, J.

In negligence actions the jurisdiction of this court is limited to $3,000 or less (State Const, art. 6, § 15; N. Y. City Court Act, § 16, subd. 1). The Federal courts can take no jurisdiction, in diverse citizenship cases, unless the amount involved exceeds $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs. (U. S. Code, tit. 28, § 41; 28 U. S. C. A. § 41, subd. 1.) So that a cause of action in negligence, which this court has jurisdiction of, may not be removed to the Federal courts, because a court having jurisdiction should not remove a cause to a court not having jurisdiction thereof. On the other hand, if the amount demanded in the complaint exceeds $3,000, there is also no necessity for removing the cause to the Federal court. In that event, this court would have no jurisdiction, and, on application made, the complaint would be dismissed. There is, therefore, no practical necessity ever to apply to this court, in a negligence case, to remove a cause to the Federal court, on the ground of diverse citizenship. An application of this kind is not a mere pro forma one, but rests in the sound judgment of the courts. (Masters v. Traders Nat. Bank, 129 Misc. 133.) (See, also, New England Tire & Sales Co., Inc., v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co., 214 App. Div. 58.)

The fact that several plaintiffs are joined in one complaint, asking for a total judgment aggregating more than $3,000, but each plaintiff asking for $3,000 ,or less, does not deprive this court of jurisdiction (Spetler v. Jogel Realty Co., Inc., 224 App. Div. 612; Dobrikin v. Union Railway Co., 130 Misc. 796), nor does it confer jurisdiction on the Federal courts. (Title Guaranty Co. v. Allen, 240 U. S. 136.) Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Idaho Ex Rel. Allen
240 U.S. 136 (Supreme Court, 1916)
New England Tire & Sales Co. v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.
214 A.D. 58 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
Spetler v. Jogel Realty Co.
224 A.D. 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)
Masters v. Traders National Bank
129 Misc. 133 (New York Supreme Court, 1927)
Dobrikin v. Union Railway Co.
130 Misc. 796 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 Misc. 928, 259 N.Y.S. 918, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plunkett-v-bain-nynyccityct-1932.