Plunkett (Noel Edward) v. U.S. Attorney General, Carlson (Norman), Henderson (j.d.), Christensen, Wingo (Andrew T.), Scott (H.), York (E.), Crabb (Robert Dale)
This text of 751 F.2d 390 (Plunkett (Noel Edward) v. U.S. Attorney General, Carlson (Norman), Henderson (j.d.), Christensen, Wingo (Andrew T.), Scott (H.), York (E.), Crabb (Robert Dale)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
751 F.2d 390
Plunkett (Noel Edward)
v.
U.S. Attorney General, Carlson (Norman), Henderson (J.D.),
Christensen, Wingo (Andrew T.), Scott (H.), York
(E.), Crabb (Robert Dale)
NOS. 82-6060, 82-5959
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit
NOV 23, 1984
Appeal From: C.D.Cal.
AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
751 F.2d 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plunkett-noel-edward-v-us-attorney-general-carlson-norman-ca9-1984.