Plummer v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Plummer v. State

144 A.D.2d 936, 535 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14399

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 144 A.D.2d 936 (Plummer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plummer v. State, 144 A.D.2d 936, 535 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14399 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to claimants, in accordance with the following memorandum: We agree with the court’s determination of the value of the property taken before consideration of its tax-exempt status.

We modify the judgment, however, by increasing the award [937]*937by $4,443, representing the increased value of the land by reason of its tax-exempt status (see, Bach v State of New York, 144 AD2d 936). We arrive at this amount by using the method of calculation used by claimants’ appraiser, who supplied the only evidence of the value of the tax exemption. The combined tax rate per thousand of $163.168, multiplied by the equalization rate of 14.72%, multiplied by $11,100, the market value of the property taken, divided by a capitalization rate of 6%, equals $4,443. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J. — appropriation.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to claimants, in accordance with the following memorandum: We agree with the court’s determination of the value of the property taken before consideration of its tax-exempt status.

We modify the judgment, however, by increasing the award [937]*937by $4,443, representing the increased value of the land by reason of its tax-exempt status (see, Bach v State of New York, 144 AD2d 936). We arrive at this amount by using the method of calculation used by claimants’ appraiser, who supplied the only evidence of the value of the tax exemption. The combined tax rate per thousand of $163.168, multiplied by the equalization rate of 14.72%, multiplied by $11,100, the market value of the property taken, divided by a capitalization rate of 6%, equals $4,443. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J. — appropriation.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 A.D.2d 936, 535 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plummer-v-state-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack