Plummer (Milton) v. Warden
This text of Plummer (Milton) v. Warden (Plummer (Milton) v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MILTON DAVID PLUMMER, No. 85112 Appellant, vs. FILED RENEE BAKER, L.C.C., AUG 1 9 2022 Respondent. ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK Qc SUPREME COURT BY DEP iYCI C"- ( (f ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for relief from judgment or order pursuant to Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from such an order in a criminal matter, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Silver
, Cadish Pickering
cc: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge Milton David Plummer Attorney General/Carson City Clerk of the Court/Court Administrator SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
EOF 14147A .-,25939
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Plummer (Milton) v. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plummer-milton-v-warden-nev-2022.