Plummer (Milton) v. Warden

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided August 19, 2022·No. 85112·Published

Opinion

SuPREME CouRT NevaDA rade PML, OF Mh SERS feta IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MILTON DAVID PLUMMER, No. 85112 Appellant, Bae mee . FILED RENEE BAKER, L.C.C., * Respondent. AUG 19 2022

ELIZASETH A. BROWN CLERK QF SUPREME COURT

BY. DEPUIY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for relief from judgment or order pursuant to Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from such an order in a criminal matter, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. Stuer? A Silver

Jd. Cadish Pickering

ec: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge Milton David Plummer Attorney General/Carson City Clerk of the Court/Court Administrator

AD -2SA3Y

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plummer (Milton) v. Warden, (Neb. 2022).

Plummer (Milton) v. Warden (Plummer (Milton) v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)