Plumley v. Plumley

8 N.J. Eq. 511
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedMarch 15, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 8 N.J. Eq. 511 (Plumley v. Plumley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plumley v. Plumley, 8 N.J. Eq. 511 (N.J. Ct. App. 1851).

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The demurrer is allowed; with costs. The complainant has liberty to amend his bill by addingparties.--

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Day v. Grossman
129 A.2d 577 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Broad St. National Bank v. Holden
156 A. 827 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 N.J. Eq. 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plumley-v-plumley-njch-1851.