Plumer v. Drake
Opinion
It is clear, that in this case, if Tilton were dead, the plea of the defendant, in its present shape, could not be received. The words of the statute are express. The creditor being alive, the debtor is permitted to sustain his plea by his own oath, unless the creditor will, upon his oath, deny the usury. And when the creditor is non compos mentis, we think the case stands on the same ground as if he were dead.
The averment in the plea, that the creditor is alive, may be proved by the oath of the defendant. We have [557] so decided in this case. And we are of opinion, that a replication stating the creditor’s want of capacity to testify, may be sustained by the oath of the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
5 N.H. 556 (Plumer v. Drake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.