PLUMBING PLANNING CORP. v. Doll

347 S.W.3d 186, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1153, 2011 WL 3890757

• Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
• Decided: September 6, 2011
• Docket: ED 96076
• Status: Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joy L. Doll (Doll) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing the Doll’s cross-claim petition against Hecht Construction Co., LLC, (Hecht) 1 alleging breach of contract, breach of warranty, and negligence related to the renovation of Doll’s home. We affirm. 2

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1 . The other parties to the underlying litigation dismissed their claims without prejudice prior to Doll’s filing of the notice of appeal with regard to her claims against Hecht. None of the other parties to the underlying litigation are involved in this appeal.

2 . Hecht filed a motion to dismiss Doll’s appeal and the notice of appeal on December 10, 2010. The motion was denied on February 8, 2011. Hecht filed a motion to dismiss Doll’s appeal for failure to file a complete legal file or, in the alternative, to strike Doll's legal file on April 20, 2011. The motion was taken with the case and is hereby denied.