Plumb v. Lyman

New York Supreme Court

Plumb v. Lyman

1 Wend. 74

DecidedAugust 15, 1828

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wend. 74 (Plumb v. Lyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plumb v. Lyman, 1 Wend. 74 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Coiirt,

'Woodworth, J.

The plaintiff being entitled only to'common pleas costs, has no right to tax the defendant with supreme court costs in consequence of a case made, or other incidental services in the progress of the suit. The same rate of charging must be preserved throughout. The costs having been taxed on á defective notice, a retaxation is ordered at the expense of the plaintiff, and the motion is granted, with cbsts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Coiirt,

'Woodworth, J.

The plaintiff being entitled only to'common pleas costs, has no right to tax the defendant with supreme court costs in consequence of a case made, or other incidental services in the progress of the suit. The same rate of charging must be preserved throughout. The costs having been taxed on á defective notice, a retaxation is ordered at the expense of the plaintiff, and the motion is granted, with cbsts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wend. 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plumb-v-lyman-nysupct-1828.