Plum v. Smith
This text of 541 P.2d 620 (Plum v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs-appellants Charles D. Plum and Donna Plum, husband and wife, instituted this action against defendants-respondents Ronald E. Smith and Christine J. Smith, husband and wife, to foreclose a mortgage which arose from a sale of real property. Default was taken and a default judgment was entered. The defendants thereafter moved to vacate the judgment pursuant to I.R.C.P. 60(b) and the district court entered an order vacating the default and the default judgment. The plaintiffs appealed from that order, contending that the motion to vacate was not timely filed. After a review of the record, we agree that the district court properly computed the time period, and properly exercised its judicial discretion in vacating the default and judgment. The order is affirmed. Costs to respondents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
541 P.2d 620, 97 Idaho 196, 1975 Ida. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plum-v-smith-idaho-1975.