Plowden v. Phelps
This text of Plowden v. Phelps (Plowden v. Phelps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
ROBERT PLOWDEN, § § Petitioner Below, § No. 606, 2018 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § PERRY PHELPS, § C.A. No. N18M-09-057 § Respondent Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: February 1, 2019 Decided: March 13, 2019
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VAUGHN and SEITZ, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s
motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below
should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court
in its order, dated November 20, 2018, dismissing the petition for a writ of
mandamus.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED
and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Plowden v. Phelps, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plowden-v-phelps-del-2019.