Plough Chemical Co. v. Nieman

4 F.2d 1013, 55 App. D.C. 401, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3164
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 1925
DocketPatent Appeal No. 1732
StatusPublished

This text of 4 F.2d 1013 (Plough Chemical Co. v. Nieman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plough Chemical Co. v. Nieman, 4 F.2d 1013, 55 App. D.C. 401, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3164 (D.C. Cir. 1925).

Opinion

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office tribunals in a trade-mark interference proceeding involving the mark “Black and White,” for use on almanacs and birthday and dream books. Appellant adopted this mark in 1919. The Patent Office has found, and in that finding we concur, that long prior to that date appellee’s predecessor adopted and used the same mark, and that in 1912 appellee succeeded to the business and good will of her predecessor. The question , is one purely of fact, and, as already intimated, a review of the evidence has convinced us of the correctness of the conclusion reached. The decision therefore is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 F.2d 1013, 55 App. D.C. 401, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plough-chemical-co-v-nieman-cadc-1925.