Plotner v. Resor
This text of 463 F.2d 422 (Plotner v. Resor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
463 F.2d 422
James F. PLOTNER, Jr., Sp. 4, United States Army, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Stanley R. RESOR, Secretary of the Army, and John C. F.
Tillson, III, Commanding General, Fort Gordon,
Georgia, Respondents-Appellants.
No. 31030.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 18, 1972.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia; Alexander A. Lawrence, Chief Judge.
William T. Morton, Asst. U. S. Atty., R. Jackson B. Smith, Jr., U. S. Atty., Barnee C. Baxter, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Augusta, Ga., for respondents-appellants.
Peter E. Rindskopf, Howard Moore, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., John H. Ruffin, Augusta, Ga., for petitioner-appellee.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The court has heretofore put this case en banc on its own motion. On the facts made known to the Court the cause has become moot since the granting of rehearing en banc. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed and the panel decision, 1971, 446 F.2d 1066 is to have no precedential value.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
463 F.2d 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plotner-v-resor-ca5-1972.