Plotkin v. Republic-Franklin Ins. Co.
This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 8234 (Plotkin v. Republic-Franklin Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Plotkin v Republic-Franklin Ins. Co. |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 08234 |
| Decided on November 13, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on November 13, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.
2018-03354
2018-13453
(Index No. 3359/11)
v
Republic-Franklin Insurance Company, et al., respondents.
Shayne, Dachs, Sauer & Dachs, LLP, Mineola, NY (Jonathan A. Dachs and Robert I. Gruber of counsel), for appellant.
Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP, New York, NY (Eric A. Portuguese and Aaron Brouk of counsel), for respondents.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420(a)(2) to recover the amount of an unsatisfied judgment against the defendants' insured, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kathy J. King, J.), dated January 3, 2018, and (2) an order of the same court dated September 20, 2018. The order dated January 3, 2018, inter alia, granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was to compel the plaintiff to appear for a deposition, and denied the plaintiff's cross motion, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing certain affirmative defenses in the defendants' answer. The order dated September 20, 2018, inter alia, denied the plaintiff's motion to vacate the order dated January 3, 2018.
ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
We dismiss the appeals as academic in light of our determination on a companion appeal (see Plotkin v Republic-Franklin Ins. Co., ___ AD3d ___ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2016-04231; decided herewith]).
MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, LEVENTHAL and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 NY Slip Op 8234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plotkin-v-republic-franklin-ins-co-nyappdiv-2019.