Plotkin v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Plotkin v. New York City Transit Authority

281 A.D.2d 529, 721 N.Y.S.2d 806, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2586

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D.2d 529 (Plotkin v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plotkin v. New York City Transit Authority, 281 A.D.2d 529, 721 N.Y.S.2d 806, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated June 29, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Hamilton v City of New York, 262 AD2d 283; Smilanich v Sauna Buffalo, 267 AD2d 1049; Kyung Sook Park v Caesar Chemists, 245 AD2d 425). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Krausman, J. P., Goldstein, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated June 29, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Hamilton v City of New York, 262 AD2d 283; Smilanich v Sauna Buffalo, 267 AD2d 1049; Kyung Sook Park v Caesar Chemists, 245 AD2d 425). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Krausman, J. P., Goldstein, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D.2d 529, 721 N.Y.S.2d 806, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plotkin-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack