Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Plotkin v. New York City Transit Authority

Plotkin v. New York City Transit Authority

281 A.D.2d 529, 721 N.Y.S.2d 806, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2586
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 19, 2001·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated June 29, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Hamilton v City of New York, 262 AD2d 283; Smilanich v Sauna Buffalo, 267 AD2d 1049; Kyung Sook Park v Caesar Chemists, 245 AD2d 425). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Krausman, J. P., Goldstein, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plotkin v. New York City Transit Authority, 281 A.D.2d 529, 721 N.Y.S.2d 806, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 529 (Plotkin v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Park v. Caesar Chemists, Inc.
245 A.D.2d 425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Hamilton v. City of New York
262 A.D.2d 283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Smilanich v. Sauna Buffalo
267 A.D.2d 1049 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)