Ploss v. Kelly

113 A.D.3d 531, 978 N.Y.2d 847

This text of 113 A.D.3d 531 (Ploss v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ploss v. Kelly, 113 A.D.3d 531, 978 N.Y.2d 847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Respondents failed to overcome the presumption of causation of General Municipal Law § 207-k by failing to cite objective medical evidence to support the finding that decedent’s ventricular arrhythmia and tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy were not caused by job-related stress. Decedent’s cardiologist attributed decedent’s increased catecholamines to job stress, which impacted his heart condition. The Medical Board, which noted other possible causes of decedent’s heart ailment, failed to cite competent and credible evidence which rebutted the conclusion of decedent’s cardiologist, and merely pointed to gaps in petitioner’s evidence, which is insufficient (see Matter of Ginther v Kelly, 109 AD3d 738, 739 [1st Dept 2013]). Concur— Tom, J.P., Acosta, Andrias, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ginther v. Kelly
109 A.D.3d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 A.D.3d 531, 978 N.Y.2d 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ploss-v-kelly-nyappdiv-2014.