PLOPPER v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

PLOPPER v. State

250 S.W.3d 442, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 559, 2008 WL 1788190

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 22, 2008

DocketED 90066

StatusPublished

This text of 250 S.W.3d 442 (PLOPPER v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

PLOPPER v. State, 250 S.W.3d 442, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 559, 2008 WL 1788190 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Otto Plopper appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in finding that the sentence imposed upon Plopper was not unconstitutional. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Otto Plopper appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in finding that the sentence imposed upon Plopper was not unconstitutional. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 S.W.3d 442, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 559, 2008 WL 1788190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plopper-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack