PLOPPER v. State
250 S.W.3d 442, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 559, 2008 WL 1788190
Opinion
ORDER
Otto Plopper appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in finding that the sentence imposed upon Plopper was not unconstitutional. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
PLOPPER v. State, 250 S.W.3d 442, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 559, 2008 WL 1788190 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
250 S.W.3d 442 (PLOPPER v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rupert v. State
250 S.W.3d 442 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)