Plohn v. Plohn

1 A.D.2d 824, 149 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6254
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 24, 1956·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified so as to delete the dismissal of the fourth cause of action on the merits and to dismiss the fourth cause of action with leave to the plaintiff, if so advised, to institute an action in law or equity based on her claim to the property involved and, as so modified, the judgment is in all other respects affirmed, without costs. We cannot accept the view of the trial court that plaintiff forfeited all rights and interest in the household furnishings, furniture and equipment when she justifiably left the household and procured a separation. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Cox, JJ. [206 Misc. 969.] [See post, p. 885.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plohn v. Plohn, 1 A.D.2d 824, 149 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6254 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

1 A.D.2d 824 (Plohn v. Plohn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sloan v. Starbare II Partners, L.P.
256 A.D.2d 104 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Darwish v. Darwish
300 N.W.2d 399 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1980)
Joyce v. Joyce
276 A.2d 692 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1970)
Tausik v. Tausik
38 Misc. 2d 11 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)