Pll Technologies, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Pll Technologies, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 2017

Docket16-2219

StatusUnpublished

This text of Pll Technologies, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc. (Pll Technologies, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pll Technologies, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

PLL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant

v.

XILINX, INC., Appellee ______________________

2016-2219 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015- 00148. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MATTHEW CARMINE PHILLIPS, Laurence & Phillips IP Law LLP, Portland, OR, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by DEREK MEEKER; STEVE WONG, Amin, Turocy & Watson, LLP, Cleveland, OH.

MATTHEW J. SILVEIRA, Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by PATRICK THOMAS MICHAEL; GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Washington, DC; DAVID B. COCHRAN, JOSEPH M. SAUER, Cleveland, OH; JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and SCHALL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI