Plissner v. Goodall Rubber Co.
This text of 216 So. 2d 228 (Plissner v. Goodall Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only question presented upon this appeal is whether the trial judge’s finding was against the manifest weight of the evidence. The court was called upon to construe a lease between the parties and determine whether it prohibited a certain activity.
The suit was for an injunction and, therefore, governed by equitable principles. There was evidence that the parties had by their own acts agreed upon the construction which the court gave to the lease. We conclude that the appellant has not demonstrated error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 So. 2d 228, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plissner-v-goodall-rubber-co-fladistctapp-1968.