Pliss v. . Erie Railroad Company
144 N.E. 906, 238 N.Y. 595, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 774
This text of 144 N.E. 906 (Pliss v. . Erie Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pliss v. . Erie Railroad Company, 144 N.E. 906, 238 N.Y. 595, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 774 (N.Y. 1924).
Opinion
Order of the Appellate Division reversed and judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. Held, that the question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence was one of fact for the jury.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hochman v. Aronowitz
251 A.D. 914 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
144 N.E. 906, 238 N.Y. 595, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pliss-v-erie-railroad-company-ny-1924.