Pliss v. . Erie Railroad Company
144 N.E. 906, 238 N.Y. 595, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 774
Opinion
Order of the Appellate Division reversed and judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. Held, that the question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence was one of fact for the jury.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pliss v. . Erie Railroad Company, 144 N.E. 906, 238 N.Y. 595, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 774 (N.Y. 1924).
144 N.E. 906 (Pliss v. . Erie Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hochman v. Aronowitz
251 A.D. 914 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)