Plimpton v. Friedberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Plimpton v. Friedberg

177 A. 890, 13 N.J. Misc. 330, 1935 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 304

DecidedApril 11, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 177 A. 890 (Plimpton v. Friedberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plimpton v. Friedberg, 177 A. 890, 13 N.J. Misc. 330, 1935 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 304 (N.J. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There have been two trials of this action. The first trial resulted in a judgment fór the defendant which was reversed by the Court of Errors and Appeals. Plimpton v. Friedberg, 110 N. J. L. 427; 166 Atl. Rep. 295. Motion is now made for a writ of capias ad satisfaciendum. We have before us the record as it went to the Court of Erro'rs and Appeals, but we have no record or transcript of what transpired subsequent thereto. There is nothing before us upon which the writ may issue.

The motion is therefore denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There have been two trials of this action. The first trial resulted in a judgment fór the defendant which was reversed by the Court of Errors and Appeals. Plimpton v. Friedberg, 110 N. J. L. 427; 166 Atl. Rep. 295. Motion is now made for a writ of capias ad satisfaciendum. We have before us the record as it went to the Court of Erro'rs and Appeals, but we have no record or transcript of what transpired subsequent thereto. There is nothing before us upon which the writ may issue.

The motion is therefore denied, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 A. 890, 13 N.J. Misc. 330, 1935 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plimpton-v-friedberg-nj-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack