Plimpton v. Cooper

21 F. App'x 159
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2001·No. 01-1551·Unpublished·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Plimpton appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing as frivolous his three civil actions and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion and orders discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Plimpton v. Cooper, 141 F.Supp.2d 573 (W.D.N.C.2001). We deny Plimpton’s motion for production of documents and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma *160 terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plimpton v. Cooper, 21 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2001).

21 F. App'x 159 (Plimpton v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stratton v. Royal Bank of Can.
2010 NCBC 2 (North Carolina Business Court, 2010)
Terry v. Sparrow
328 B.R. 442 (M.D. North Carolina, 2005)
Byrd v. Hopson
265 F. Supp. 2d 594 (W.D. North Carolina, 2003)