Plimpton v. Brown Bros.
172 A.D. 936, 156 N.Y.S. 1141
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1916
StatusPublished
This text of 172 A.D. 936 (Plimpton v. Brown Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Plimpton v. Brown Bros., 172 A.D. 936, 156 N.Y.S. 1141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the clause in the contract providing that “ any stock which does not prove to be true to name, as labeled, is to be replaced free, or purchase price refunded, but is not further warranted,” limited plaintiff’s recovery to the purchase price of said trees. All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
172 A.D. 936, 156 N.Y.S. 1141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plimpton-v-brown-bros-nyappdiv-1916.