Plevy v. Plevy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Plevy v. Plevy

295 So. 2d 139, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7067

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 19, 1974

DocketNo. 73-336

StatusPublished

This text of 295 So. 2d 139 (Plevy v. Plevy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plevy v. Plevy, 295 So. 2d 139, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7067 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The wife appeals from a final judgment of dissolution. She is dissatisfied with the financial provisions of the judgment. We have reviewed the award with regard to the record and the advices of counsel. It is our conclusion from the appellate level that there has been no demonstration of an abuse of discretion so as to merit a reversal. Lang v. Lang, 280 So.2d 11 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1973); Scott v. Scott, 285 So.2d 423 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1973); Fishman v. Fishman, 245 So.2d 258 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1971); see Doane v. Doane, 279 So.2d 46 (4th D.C.A.Fla.1973); King v. King, 271 So.2d 159 (1st D.C.A.Fla.1973); Swain v. Swain, 270 So.2d 747 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1972); Ray v. Ray, 247 So.2d 473 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1971).

We are mindful that the wife has the right to apply for modification if there should be a change in the circumstances of the parties. Fla.Stat. 61.14, F.S.A., (1971); see Carmel v. Carmel, 282 So.2d 6 (3d D. [140]*140C.A.Fla.1973); Wilson v. Wilson, 279 So. 2d 893 (4th D.C.A.Fla.1973).

Affirmed.

WALDEN and DOWNEY, JJ., and WADDELL, TOM, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The wife appeals from a final judgment of dissolution. She is dissatisfied with the financial provisions of the judgment. We have reviewed the award with regard to the record and the advices of counsel. It is our conclusion from the appellate level that there has been no demonstration of an abuse of discretion so as to merit a reversal. Lang v. Lang, 280 So.2d 11 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1973); Scott v. Scott, 285 So.2d 423 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1973); Fishman v. Fishman, 245 So.2d 258 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1971); see Doane v. Doane, 279 So.2d 46 (4th D.C.A.Fla.1973); King v. King, 271 So.2d 159 (1st D.C.A.Fla.1973); Swain v. Swain, 270 So.2d 747 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1972); Ray v. Ray, 247 So.2d 473 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1971).

We are mindful that the wife has the right to apply for modification if there should be a change in the circumstances of the parties. Fla.Stat. 61.14, F.S.A., (1971); see Carmel v. Carmel, 282 So.2d 6 (3d D. [140]*140C.A.Fla.1973); Wilson v. Wilson, 279 So. 2d 893 (4th D.C.A.Fla.1973).

Affirmed.

WALDEN and DOWNEY, JJ., and WADDELL, TOM, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 So. 2d 139, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plevy-v-plevy-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack