Pleva v. Gottzeit

181 A. 44, 115 N.J.L. 505, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 329
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 9, 1935·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pleva v. Gottzeit, 181 A. 44, 115 N.J.L. 505, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 329 (N.J. 1935).

181 A. 44 (Pleva v. Gottzeit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Scher
650 A.2d 1012 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
Wright v. Bernstein
129 A.2d 19 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1957)