Pleva v. Gottzeit
181 A. 44, 115 N.J.L. 505, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 329
This text of 181 A. 44 (Pleva v. Gottzeit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pleva v. Gottzeit, 181 A. 44, 115 N.J.L. 505, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 329 (N.J. 1935).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Scher
650 A.2d 1012 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
Wright v. Bernstein
129 A.2d 19 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1957)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
181 A. 44, 115 N.J.L. 505, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pleva-v-gottzeit-nj-1935.