Pletz v. Panetta

Fourth Circuit

Pletz v. Panetta

376 F. App'x 335

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2010·No. No. 09-1388·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Debra Pletz appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pletz v. Hayden, No. 1:08-cv-00539-CMH-TCB, 2009 WL 274505 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 4, 2009; entered Feb. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Debra Pletz appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pletz v. Hayden, No. 1:08-cv-00539-CMH-TCB, 2009 WL 274505 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 4, 2009; entered Feb. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Pletz v. Panetta, 376 F. App'x 335 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

376 F. App'x 335 (Pletz v. Panetta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.