Plesch v. Banque Nationale De La Republique D'Haiti

81 N.E.2d 106, 298 N.Y. 573
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 16, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 81 N.E.2d 106 (Plesch v. Banque Nationale De La Republique D'Haiti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plesch v. Banque Nationale De La Republique D'Haiti, 81 N.E.2d 106, 298 N.Y. 573 (N.Y. 1948).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

At least as regards the securities that were delivered into the custody of the defendant and kept in safekeeping accounts maintained by it in New York, we agree with the conclusion of a majority of the Appellate Division that the plaintiffs have made a prima facie showing of a cause of action in conversion which accrued in this State and is sufficient to withstand a motion to vacate the warrant of attachment. Since the motion was not one to modify, but only to vacate the war *575 rant, we deem it unnecessary to determine whether the plaintiffs have made such a showing with respect to all the securities entrusted to the defendant’s custody, particularly those physically situated in Haiti at the time of the promulgation of the decrees of the Bepublic of Haiti on which the defendant relies. It is enough that as to a major portion of their claim we cannot say as matter of law on this record that the plaintiffs must ultimately be defeated (see American Reserve Ins. Co. v. China Ins. Co., 297 N. Y. 322, 325).

At Special Term the defendant claimed immunity from suit and from attachment of its property as a sovereign instrumentality of the Republic of Haiti, but that claim is not urged oh this appeal.

The order should be afi&rmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the negative.

Loughran, Cli. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Ftjld, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Republic Of Iraq v. First National City Bank
353 F.2d 47 (First Circuit, 1966)
Republic of Iraq v. First National City Bank
353 F.2d 47 (Second Circuit, 1965)
Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.
209 N.E.2d 68 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)
Republic of Iraq v. First National City Bank
241 F. Supp. 567 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Sabbatino
376 U.S. 398 (Supreme Court, 1964)
City of Albany v. McMorran
34 Misc. 2d 304 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Zwack v. Kraus Bros. & Co.
133 F. Supp. 929 (S.D. New York, 1955)
Stephen v. Zivnostenska Banka
31 Misc. 2d 45 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
Sulyok v. Penzintezeti Kozpont Budapest
279 A.D. 528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 N.E.2d 106, 298 N.Y. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plesch-v-banque-nationale-de-la-republique-dhaiti-ny-1948.