Pleaters Etc. Assn. v. Superior Court
299 P. 555, 114 Cal. App. 35
Opinion
THE COURT.
[1] It appears to the court that the order sought to be reviewed, wherein an application for confirmation of an arbitration award was dismissed "with prejudice," was in effect an order vacating the award, and that such order is subject to the right of appeal. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1293.) It follows that the writ of review does not lie in this case. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1068.) For that reason the petition is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pleaters Etc. Assn. v. Superior Court, 299 P. 555, 114 Cal. App. 35 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).
299 P. 555 (Pleaters Etc. Assn. v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jordan v. Pacific Automobile Insurance
232 Cal. App. 2d 127 (California Court of Appeal, 1965)
Robinson v. Superior Court
218 P.2d 10 (California Supreme Court, 1950)
Glesby v. Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Ltd.
147 P.2d 60 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)