Pleasantville Estates, Inc. v. New York Central Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pleasantville Estates, Inc. v. New York Central Railroad

264 A.D. 879, 35 N.Y.S.2d 596, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5225

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 879 (Pleasantville Estates, Inc. v. New York Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pleasantville Estates, Inc. v. New York Central Railroad, 264 A.D. 879, 35 N.Y.S.2d 596, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5225 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to restrain defendant from obstructing or interfering with plaintiff’s right of way over certain land on which the defendant’s tracks run, and for other relief. Judgment entered in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. The right of way is defined and granted by the mortgage instrument of November 14, 1924, and defined in the subsequent conveyance to which the mortgage instrument refers. Plaintiff has succeeded to the rights of the mortgagee therein. On the pleadings and proof herein it would not be proper to grant relief for excessive user of the way. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to restrain defendant from obstructing or interfering with plaintiff’s right of way over certain land on which the defendant’s tracks run, and for other relief. Judgment entered in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. The right of way is defined and granted by the mortgage instrument of November 14, 1924, and defined in the subsequent conveyance to which the mortgage instrument refers. Plaintiff has succeeded to the rights of the mortgagee therein. On the pleadings and proof herein it would not be proper to grant relief for excessive user of the way. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 879, 35 N.Y.S.2d 596, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pleasantville-estates-inc-v-new-york-central-railroad-nyappdiv-1942.