Pleasants v. Pemberton
2 U.S. 196, 1 L. Ed. 346, 2 Dall. 196, 1793 U.S. LEXIS 233
This text of 2 U.S. 196 (Pleasants v. Pemberton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pleasants v. Pemberton, 2 U.S. 196, 1 L. Ed. 346, 2 Dall. 196, 1793 U.S. LEXIS 233 (1793).
Opinion
The general .expreflion in Walton1 &¡* Shelley muft be limited as explained in 3 Term. 33. 6. and, therefore, lince the witnefs is difinterefted, he muft be admitted. Befides, he is not to contradict the writing, or deny any thing that is in it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thompson v. Bank of Gettysburg
3 Grant 119 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1859)
Harding v. Mott
20 Pa. 469 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1853)
Wilt v. Snyder
17 Pa. 77 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1851)
Mitchell v. Cotten
2 Fla. 136 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1848)
Mitchell v. Conrow
5 Whart. 572 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1840)
Harrisburg Bank v. Forster
8 Watts 304 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1839)
Gest v. Espy
2 Watts 265 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1834)
Knight v. Packard
14 S.C.L. 71 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1825)
Morris v. Edwards
1 Ohio 189 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1823)
Bank of Montgomery County v. Walker
9 Serg. & Rawle 229 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1823)
Long v. Bailie
4 Serg. & Rawle 222 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1818)
Baring v. Shippen
2 Binn. 154 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1809)
Cunningham v. Butler.
3 N.C. 392 (Superior Court of North Carolina, 1806)
Mason v. Evans
1 N.J.L. 211 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1793)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 U.S. 196, 1 L. Ed. 346, 2 Dall. 196, 1793 U.S. LEXIS 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pleasants-v-pemberton-scotus-1793.