Pleasants & Co. v. Lewis

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Pleasants & Co. v. Lewis

1 Va. 353

DecidedOctober 15, 1794

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Va. 353 (Pleasants & Co. v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pleasants & Co. v. Lewis, 1 Va. 353 (Va. Ct. App. 1794).

Pincite

Opinion

The Peesident.

The condition of the bond was not performed by the partial delivery stated in the record, and, of course, the penalty became forfeited.

[354]*354The judgment must, therefore, be reversed, and the cause remitted to the District Court, to proceed to judgment on the bond, allowing credit for any money which may be proved to have been paid to the appellants, or to have been raised by the sale of any part of the wheat delivered.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Peesident.

The condition of the bond was not performed by the partial delivery stated in the record, and, of course, the penalty became forfeited.

[354]*354The judgment must, therefore, be reversed, and the cause remitted to the District Court, to proceed to judgment on the bond, allowing credit for any money which may be proved to have been paid to the appellants, or to have been raised by the sale of any part of the wheat delivered.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Va. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pleasants-co-v-lewis-vactapp-1794.