Pleasant Valley Irrigation Co. v. Lord
This text of 111 P.2d 640 (Pleasant Valley Irrigation Co. v. Lord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action involves respective water rights, claimed by appellant and respondents in Black’s Creek, alias Ten-Mile Creek, conflicting as to priority both in time and amount.
The assignments of error challenge only the findings of fact; thus, issues of fact alone are the essence of the controversy.
The evidence, though conflicting, is sufficient to sustain the findings of fact and the judgment is therefore affirmed. (Evans v. Davidson, 58 Ida. 600, 77 Pac. (2d) 661; In re Randall’s Estate, 58 Ida. 143, 70 Pac. (2d) 389; Eaton v. McWilliams, 52 Ida. 145, 12 Pac. (2d) 259; Walker v. Jackson, 48 Ida. 18, 279 Pac. 293; East *282 wood v. Standard Mines & Mill. Co., 11 Ida. 195, 81 Pac. 382; McKissick v. Oregon Short Line Ry Co., 13 Ida. 195, 89 Pac. 629; Patrick v. Bisbee, 52 Ida. 369, 15 Pac. (2d) 730; Gordon v. Sunshine Mining Co., 43 Ida. 439, 252 Pac. 870; Lisenby v. Intermountain State Bank, 33 Ida. 101, 190 Pac. 355.)
Costs awarded to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 P.2d 640, 62 Idaho 281, 1941 Ida. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pleasant-valley-irrigation-co-v-lord-idaho-1941.