Pleasant Valley Home Construction, Ltd. v. Van Wagner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pleasant Valley Home Construction, Ltd. v. Van Wagner

53 A.D.2d 863, 385 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13695

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 6, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent zoning board of appeals, made September 25, 1975, which, after a hearing, denied petitioner’s application for a special use permit, the board appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated December 23, 1975, which (1) granted the application, (2) annulled the determination and (3) directed issuance of the permit subject to reasonable conditions which it might impose with reference to specified matters. Judgment afiirmed, without costs or disbursements. The record shows that the proposed use meets the standards prescribed by the local zoning ordinance; issuance of the permit was therefore a duty imposed on the board subject to reasonable conditions which it might impose with reference to the matters specified in the judgment (see Matter of Knight v Bodkin, 41 AD2d 413, 417; 1 Rathkopf, Law of Zoning and Planning [4th ed], p 12-39). Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent zoning board of appeals, made September 25, 1975, which, after a hearing, denied petitioner’s application for a special use permit, the board appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated December 23, 1975, which (1) granted the application, (2) annulled the determination and (3) directed issuance of the permit subject to reasonable conditions which it might impose with reference to specified matters. Judgment afiirmed, without costs or disbursements. The record shows that the proposed use meets the standards prescribed by the local zoning ordinance; issuance of the permit was therefore a duty imposed on the board subject to reasonable conditions which it might impose with reference to the matters specified in the judgment (see Matter of Knight v Bodkin, 41 AD2d 413, 417; 1 Rathkopf, Law of Zoning and Planning [4th ed], p 12-39). Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Pleasant Valley Home Construction, Ltd. v. Van Wagner, 53 A.D.2d 863, 385 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

53 A.D.2d 863 (Pleasant Valley Home Construction, Ltd. v. Van Wagner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related