Pleasant v. Repass

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedOctober 30, 1998
Docket03A01-9804-CH-00117
StatusPublished

This text of Pleasant v. Repass (Pleasant v. Repass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pleasant v. Repass, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

I N T H E C O U R T O F A P P E A L S A T K N O X V I L L E FILED October 30, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk R A Y P L E A S A N T ) S U L L I V A N C O U N T Y ) 0 3 A 0 1 - 9 8 0 4 - C H - 0 0 1 1 7 P l a i n t i f f - A p p e l l e e ) ) ) v . ) H O N . R . J E R R Y B E C K , ) J U D G E ) M I C H A E L J . R E P A S S a n d ) P A M E L A S . R E P A S S ) ) D e f e n d a n t s - A p p e l l a n t s ) A F F I R M E D A N D R E M A N D E D

T I M O T H Y E . S C O T T O F K I N G S P O R T F O R A P P E L L A N T

W I L L I A M K . R O G E R S O F K I N G S P O R T F O R A P P E L L E E

O P I N I O N

Goddard, P.J.

This appeal had its genesis in a real estate

transaction wherein Defendants-Appellants Michael J. Repass and

his wife Pamela S. Repass sold a tract of land to Plaintiff-

Appellee Ray Pleasant. A judgment in favor of Mr. Pleasant in

the amount of $22,224.70 was granted upon the theory that the

Defendants had misrepresented certain material matters in the

sale of the property. The evidence adduced below was not preserved by a

transcript or statement of the evidence. Under these

circumstances an appellate court must conclusively presume the

evidence was sufficient to justify the judgment. Trane Co. v.

Morrison, 566 S.W.2d 849 (Tenn.1978); Daniel v. Metropolitan

Government, 696 S.W.2d 8 (Tenn.App.1985).

For the foregoing reason the judgment of the Trial

Court is affirmed and the cause remanded for collection of the

judgment and costs below. Costs of appeal are adjudged against

Mr. and Mrs. Repass and their surety.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ H o u s t o n M . G o d d a r d , P . J .

C O N C U R :

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ H e r s c h e l P . F r a n k s , J .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D o n T . M c M u r r a y , J .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trane Co. v. Morrison
566 S.W.2d 849 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1978)
Daniel v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County
696 S.W.2d 8 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pleasant v. Repass, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pleasant-v-repass-tennctapp-1998.