Pleasant Hill Motor Co. v. Haire

140 So. 129
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 16, 1932
DocketNo. 4139
StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 129 (Pleasant Hill Motor Co. v. Haire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pleasant Hill Motor Co. v. Haire, 140 So. 129 (La. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

PALMER, J.

When this case was reached on the calendar, counsel for defendant made no appearance. Defendant now asks for the privilege of filing a motion to dismiss the appeal and accompanies it with an affidavit of his attorney, averring that through an error of the district clerk his name was not listed ás defendant’s attorney when this record was prepared for the Court of Appeal, but, instead, the name of another attorney was given, and that on account of that error defendant was not represented at the hearing in this court and had no opportunity of filing this motion before the case was submitted.

Under these circumstances, we have concluded to return this case to the calendar to be refixed for argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 So. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pleasant-hill-motor-co-v-haire-lactapp-1932.