Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pleas v. State

Pleas v. State

842 So. 2d 969, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4730, 2003 WL 1797932
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 8, 2003
DocketNo. 1D01-0068
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 842 So. 2d 969 (Pleas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pleas v. State, 842 So. 2d 969, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4730, 2003 WL 1797932 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

BROWNING, J.

We affirm the Appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, we remand for correction of the written judgment and sentence in lower court case number 98-3154 to conform with the oral pronouncement of the sentence. See, e.g., Marshall v. State, 652 So.2d 974 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Specifically, we note that the written judgment and sentence must make reference to the fact that, on count two of that case, Appellant was sentenced as a prison releasee reoffender.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of written sentence.

BARFIELD and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. State
842 So. 2d 969 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
842 So. 2d 969, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4730, 2003 WL 1797932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pleas-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.