Plaza v. State
This text of 717 So. 2d 58 (Plaza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We accepted review of Plaza v. State, 699 So.2d 289 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), on the basis of express and direct conflict with the decisions in Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla.1996), and State v. Johans, 613 So.2d 1319 (Fla.1993). See Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. However, after hearing oral argument, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, the petition for review is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
717 So. 2d 58, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 423, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1481, 1998 WL 608233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plaza-v-state-fla-1998.