Plaza v. Black

2023 Ohio 1787
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 30, 2023
Docket22CA011932
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2023 Ohio 1787 (Plaza v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plaza v. Black, 2023 Ohio 1787 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

[Cite as Plaza v. Black, 2023-Ohio-1787.]

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN )

ROBERT PLAZA C.A. No. 22CA011932 Petitioner

v. ORIGINAL ACTION IN JENNIFER BLACK, WARDEN HABEAS CORPUS

Respondent

Dated: May 30, 2023

PER CURIAM.

{¶1} Robert Plaza has petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus to compel

Respondent, Jennifer Black, to release him from custody. Warden Black has moved to dismiss.

Mr. Plaza responded in opposition and, later, filed a notice of change of address stating that he had

been moved to a different prison. For the following reasons, this Court dismisses the petition.

{¶2} When Mr. Plaza filed this action, he was incarcerated in the Lorain Correctional

Institution in Lorain County. That made the Lorain County Court of Appeals the appropriate court

to consider his petition for writ of habeas corpus:

If a person restrained of his liberty is an inmate of a state benevolent or correctional institution, the location of which is fixed by statute and at the time is in the custody of the officers of the institution, no court or judge other than the courts or judges of the county in which the institution is located has jurisdiction to issue or determine a writ of habeas corpus for his production or discharge. Any writ issued by a court or judge of another county to an officer or person in charge at the state institution to compel the production or discharge of an inmate thereof is void.

(Emphasis added) R.C. 2725.03. C.A. No. 22CA011932 Page 2 of 3

{¶3} After this action was filed, and after the Warden moved to dismiss and Mr. Plaza

responded, Mr. Plaza has filed a notice of change of address with the Lorain County Clerk of

Courts. That notice informed the Court that Mr. Plaza has been transferred to the Richland

Correctional Institution, located in Richland County. Thus, Mr. Plaza is no longer incarcerated in

Lorain County in the territorial jurisdiction of the Lorain County Court of Appeals.

{¶4} When a prisoner has been transferred to a prison outside the territorial jurisdiction

of the court, that court loses jurisdiction to consider the petition for writ of habeas corpus. State

ex rel. Robinson v. Fender, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3701, ¶ 4, 6. The Supreme Court has

“strictly construed” the language of R.C. 2725.03. Id. citing Brown v. Hall, 123 Ohio St.3d 381,

2009-Ohio-5592, ¶ 1; Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, ¶ 17-18.

{¶5} Because Mr. Plaza has been transferred to a prison outside of the territorial

jurisdiction of the Lorain County Court of Appeals, this Court must dismiss the petition. Robinson

at ¶ 6.

{¶6} This case is dismissed. Costs are taxed to Mr. Plaza.

{¶7} The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default notice

of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. See Civ.R. 58.

JENNIFER L. HENSAL FOR THE COURT

SUTTON, J. STEVENSON, J. CONCUR. C.A. No. 22CA011932 Page 3 of 3

APPEARANCES:

ROBERT PLAZA, Pro Se, Petitioner.

DAVE YOST, Attorney General, and JERRI L. FOSNAUGHT, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Plaza v. Black
2024 Ohio 853 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 Ohio 1787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plaza-v-black-ohioctapp-2023.