Playcrafters Student Members v. Teaneck Tp. Bd. of Ed.

438 A.2d 543, 88 N.J. 74
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedDecember 22, 1981
StatusPublished

This text of 438 A.2d 543 (Playcrafters Student Members v. Teaneck Tp. Bd. of Ed.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Playcrafters Student Members v. Teaneck Tp. Bd. of Ed., 438 A.2d 543, 88 N.J. 74 (N.J. 1981).

Opinion

88 N.J. 74 (1981)
438 A.2d 543

STUDENT MEMBERS OF THE PLAYCRAFTERS, AN ORGANIZATION OF TEANECK HIGH SCHOOL, RICHARD STREAN, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN, AD LITEM, MARCIA STREAN, JEREMY FEIGELSON, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, MIRIAM C. FEIGELSON, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK, AUBREY SHER, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK, AND JAMES DELANEY, PRINCIPAL OF TEANECK HIGH SCHOOL, AND NEW JERSEY STATE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, FRED G. BURKE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 30, 1981.
Decided December 22, 1981.

John L. Weichsel argued the cause for appellants (John L. Weichsel, attorney; John L. Weichsel and A. Gregory Auriemma, on the brief).

Robert H. Greenwood argued the cause for respondent Board of Education of the Township of Teaneck, et al. (Greenwood & Sayovitz, attorneys).

Mary Ann Burgess, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey State Commissioner of Education, Fred G. Burke (James R. Zazzali, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Erminie L. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Daniel D. Chazin submitted a brief on behalf of amici curiae The National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs ("COLPA") and The American Jewish Congress (Daniel D. Chazin, attorney; Martin B. Cowan and Marc D. Stern, members of the New York Bar, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division reported at 177 N.J. Super. 66 (1981).

*75 For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK and O'HERN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PLAYCRAFTERS, ETC. v. Teaneck Tp. Bd. of Ed.
424 A.2d 1192 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1981)
Student Members of the Playcrafters v. Board of Education
438 A.2d 543 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
438 A.2d 543, 88 N.J. 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/playcrafters-student-members-v-teaneck-tp-bd-of-ed-nj-1981.