Playcare, Inc. v. Battaglia

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Playcare, Inc. v. Battaglia

280 So. 2d 34, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7798

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 6, 1973

DocketNo. 72-904

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 So. 2d 34 (Playcare, Inc. v. Battaglia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Playcare, Inc. v. Battaglia, 280 So. 2d 34, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7798 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a summary judgment entered in plaintiff-appellee’s favor in a suit for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien.

The pleadings, affidavits and counter-affidavits reveal there was a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment. Specifically, defendant admits an oral contract for extras, but the question is raised whether the defendant-appellant had, in fact, paid others directly for the extras so as to offset the total amount due to plaintiff. Since fact issues exist, summary judgment was prematurely entered and we, therefore, reverse and remand for proceedings consistent herewith. Rule 1.-510(c), F.R.C.P., 31 F.S.A.; Graham v. First Marion Bank, Fla.App.1970, 237 So. 2d 793.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a summary judgment entered in plaintiff-appellee’s favor in a suit for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien.

The pleadings, affidavits and counter-affidavits reveal there was a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment. Specifically, defendant admits an oral contract for extras, but the question is raised whether the defendant-appellant had, in fact, paid others directly for the extras so as to offset the total amount due to plaintiff. Since fact issues exist, summary judgment was prematurely entered and we, therefore, reverse and remand for proceedings consistent herewith. Rule 1.-510(c), F.R.C.P., 31 F.S.A.; Graham v. First Marion Bank, Fla.App.1970, 237 So. 2d 793.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 So. 2d 34, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/playcare-inc-v-battaglia-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack