Playcare, Inc. v. Battaglia

280 So. 2d 34, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7798
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 6, 1973·No. No. 72-904·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a summary judgment entered in plaintiff-appellee’s favor in a suit for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien.

The pleadings, affidavits and counter-affidavits reveal there was a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment. Specifically, defendant admits an oral contract for extras, but the question is raised whether the defendant-appellant had, in fact, paid others directly for the extras so as to offset the total amount due to plaintiff. Since fact issues exist, summary judgment was prematurely entered and we, therefore, reverse and remand for proceedings consistent herewith. Rule 1.-510(c), F.R.C.P., 31 F.S.A.; Graham v. First Marion Bank, Fla.App.1970, 237 So. 2d 793.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Playcare, Inc. v. Battaglia, 280 So. 2d 34, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7798 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

280 So. 2d 34 (Playcare, Inc. v. Battaglia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. Jim Moran Pontiac, Inc.
292 So. 2d 392 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)