Plaut v. State

20 Ohio C.C. 707
CourtOhio Circuit Courts
DecidedJanuary 15, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ohio C.C. 707 (Plaut v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plaut v. State, 20 Ohio C.C. 707 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

It was contended at the trial below that under the showing that it was an emergency wherein the defendant had prescribed, the jury should be directed to return a verdict of not guilty. The trial judge refused to do so, and the circuit court sustains this action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Ohio C.C. 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plaut-v-state-ohiocirct-1899.