Platzman v. American Totalisator Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Platzman v. American Totalisator Co.

57 A.D.2d 755, 394 N.Y.S.2d 560, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 A.D.2d 755 (Platzman v. American Totalisator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Platzman v. American Totalisator Co., 57 A.D.2d 755, 394 N.Y.S.2d 560, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on October 4, 1976, denying defendant-appellant Computer Sciences Corporation’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint herein against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed and the action severed as to defendant-appellant. Defendant-appellant Computer Sciences Corporation shall recover of respondent $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The record discloses that, in June, 1971, appellant’s system for computerized offtrack betting became the first system to be placed in operation by the New York City Off-Track Betting Corporation. The record is silent on any dealings between plaintiff and this defendant and, more important is the fact that plaintiff has failed to advance, with any degree of particularity, any theory which would render this defendant liable to him. The failure to factually indicate any cause of action against this defendant warrants summary dismissal of the complaint against it. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Silverman, Capozzoli, Lane and Markewich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on October 4, 1976, denying defendant-appellant Computer Sciences Corporation’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint herein against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed and the action severed as to defendant-appellant. Defendant-appellant Computer Sciences Corporation shall recover of respondent $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The record discloses that, in June, 1971, appellant’s system for computerized offtrack betting became the first system to be placed in operation by the New York City Off-Track Betting Corporation. The record is silent on any dealings between plaintiff and this defendant and, more important is the fact that plaintiff has failed to advance, with any degree of particularity, any theory which would render this defendant liable to him. The failure to factually indicate any cause of action against this defendant warrants summary dismissal of the complaint against it. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Silverman, Capozzoli, Lane and Markewich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 755, 394 N.Y.S.2d 560, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/platzman-v-american-totalisator-co-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack