Platts v. O'Brien

Fourth Circuit

Platts v. O'Brien

547 F. App'x 228

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 26, 2013·No. No. 13-7486·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James C. Platts, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Platts v. O’Brien, No. 5:13-cv-00061-FPS-DJJ, 2013 WL 4785987 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James C. Platts, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Platts v. O’Brien, No. 5:13-cv-00061-FPS-DJJ, 2013 WL 4785987 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Platts v. O'Brien, 547 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

547 F. App'x 228 (Platts v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related