Plattenburg v. Plattenburg

Missouri Court of Appeals

Plattenburg v. Plattenburg

272 S.W.3d 908, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 7, 2009 WL 21031

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 6, 2009·No. WD 69337·Published

Opinion

*909 Order

PER CURIAM:

Brenda Plattenburg appeals the judgment of modification entered in December 2007. She contends on appeal that the court erred in terminating her maintenance established in the 2004 dissolution proceeding.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*909 Order

PER CURIAM:

Brenda Plattenburg appeals the judgment of modification entered in December 2007. She contends on appeal that the court erred in terminating her maintenance established in the 2004 dissolution proceeding.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Plattenburg v. Plattenburg, 272 S.W.3d 908, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 7, 2009 WL 21031 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

272 S.W.3d 908 (Plattenburg v. Plattenburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.